Denying Patents on Discoveries Puts Public Health at Risk
After nine years of costly legal proceedings the United States Patent Office denied the patent by misapplying the law. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rubberstamped the Patent Office and...
View ArticleFederal Circuit: Attorneys Not Liable for Attorney’s Fees Where Law is Unsettled
A claim is entirely without color when it lacks any legal or factual basis. Because of the relative paucity of § 101 cases between Alice and AlphaCap’s complaint, the law was unsettled. The Federal...
View ArticleAbstractness is not the malleable concept the Supreme Court thinks
If the claim is directed to an abstract idea, then abstractness is an essential property of the claimed subject matter as a whole. As such, a claim directed to an abstract idea cannot be transformed to...
View ArticleA Realistic Perspective on post-Alice Software Patent Eligibility
Much of the havoc wrought in the software patent system by the landmark decision Alice v. CLS Bank International, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014) stems from the unworkable two-part patent eligibility test based...
View ArticleWriting a Software Patent Application
Any good patent application that covers a software related invention will need to put forth three specific pieces of information. First, you need to describe the overall computer architecture of the...
View ArticleSupreme Court Denies Cert in Two-Way Media v. Comcast, Refuses Another 101 Case
The U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari in Two-Way Media Ltd. v. Comcast Cable Communications, refusing to hear yet another appeal in a case involving a question of patent...
View ArticleWhy isn’t Congress Upset about Judicial Exceptions to Patent Eligibility?
Some courts have characterized this final inquiry as “the hunt for the inventive concept.” That would make some logical sense if and only if a claimed invention that is novel and non-obvious would be...
View ArticleBoston Patent Law Association Announces Support for IPO-AIPLA Section 101...
The Boston Patent Law Association (BPLA) has announced its support for a proposal for a legislative fix to 35 U.S.C. § 101, the statute governing basic patentability in U.S. patent law, which was...
View ArticleUnintelligible and Irreconcilable: Patent Eligibility in America
The Alice/Mayo framework does not mandate a conclusion, it tolerates – even enables – whatever conclusion the decision maker prefers. This is allowed because of a universe of irreconcilable opinions...
View ArticleIs the Federal Circuit Closer to Requiring a Real Claim Construction for...
To date the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has not explicitly required district courts to conduct a formal claim construction prior to determining whether a patent claim is...
View ArticleThe Hunt for the Inventive Concept is the Flash of Creative Genius Test by...
Today the flash of creative genius test has reared its ugly head once more, this time as a consideration under a patent eligibility inquiry and 35 U.S.C. 101 instead of under an obviousness inquiry and...
View ArticleDoes the Supreme Court even appreciate the patent eligibility chaos they...
At the beginning of this decade the United States Supreme Court embarked on a path that would ultimately result in a significant re-writing of the law of patent eligibility in America. While this...
View Article