Would Monopoly® be patent ineligible under Alice?
One particularly disconcerting and largely unpredictable aspect of Alice is how it has been used to render games patent ineligible. This type of Alice-creep is particularly disconcerting because it...
View ArticleFree Webinar: Learning what the most successful companies do to overcome...
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016, at 2pm ET, I will be hosting a free webinar discussion on how to overcome Alice rejections. I will discuss the companies that are most successful at overcoming Alice...
View ArticleUSPTO handling of patent eligibility sparks substantive discussion at PPAC...
Bahr explained a number of things, including the reason the USPTO has not updated patent eligibility guidance to address the pro-patent decision of the Federal Circuit in BASCOM v. AT&T. Many in...
View ArticleUSPTO ‘judgment calls’ to blame for reopening prosecution after complete...
Robert Bahr, the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, responded that “hindsight is great,” and went on to explain that they thought that the rejections that were being appealed to the...
View ArticleSquare fights off Alice rejection on payment transfer patent proving...
U.S. Patent No. 9378491, entitled Payment Transfer by Sending E-mail. This discloses a computer-implemented method which enables the seamless initiation of a payment transfer through e-mail from one...
View ArticleMore software patent eligible, Federal Circuit says lip synchronization not...
It is hard to ignore the fact that the Federal Circuit again continued to point out that the innovation at issued was an improvement. This should give patent practitioners important clues into how to...
View ArticleIs it Time To Amend 101?
Rather than the drastic measure of abolishing § 101, such as that proposed by previous USPTO Director Kappos, we think that a simple change to § 101 that removes the confusing notion of “inventiveness”...
View ArticleAffinity Labs of Texas loses two patent eligibility cases at the Federal Circuit
Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC, lost two cases at the Federal Circuit last week, both in decisions authored by Judge Bryson, which Chief Judge Prost and Judge Wallach joining the opinions. Although the...
View ArticleIt is time for Judge Mayer to Step Down from the Federal Circuit
Simply stated, the industry and the public deserve better than Judge Mayer. His anti-patent views so cloud his judgment that he twists, exaggerates and misrepresents in order to attempt to impose his...
View ArticleFederal Circuit Clarifies ‘Inventive Concept’ as Applied to Computers
This case concerned the subject matter eligibility of patents under 35 U.S.C. § 101, for a computer-related invention. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision that two patents were...
View Article50 Years of Controversy Rages On: A Closer Look at Computer-Implemented...
This article reviews the 50 years of controversy on software patents. Because there continues to be a cloud over computer-implemented inventions, the article makes the argument, through indisputable...
View ArticleClaims broad enough to encompass mental processes are unpatentable abstract...
The Court reasoned that the claims were limited to straightforward steps that a skilled artisan could perform mentally and that the inventors admitted to doing so. The claims, on their face, do not...
View ArticleFREE WEBINAR: Drafting Patent Applications to Overcome Alice
Join us on Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 2pm ET for a discussion on drafting patent applications to overcome Alice, with JiNan Glasgow of Neopatents and Gene Quinn of IPWatchdog. In addition to taking...
View ArticleFederal Circuit holds software claims to be patent-eligible because they...
Amdocs (Israel), Ltd. v. Openet Telecom, Inc., Appeal No. 2015-1180, is a precedential case from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that reverses a judgment on the pleadings that certain...
View ArticleUSPTO issues new memorandum on software eligibility in light of McRo, BASCOM
Earlier today the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a new memorandum to patent examiners on recent software patent eligibility decisions from the Federal Circuit. The memo sent to the...
View ArticleMore Humans Have Walked on the Moon than have Won Eligibility Cases Before...
In reaching its decision, the CAFC ignored the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981). The claims in dispute are unlike the claims in Alice, which merely applied...
View ArticleHow to Patent Software in a Post Alice Era
In a nutshell, if you are going to write a patent application in such a way that at the end of the it the reader is left wondering what the innovation is, what the problem being solved is, or the...
View ArticleA Guide to Software Patent Eligibility at the Federal Circuit
The Alice/Mayo framework is the decisional approach adopted by the United States Supreme Court for determining whether a patent claim exhibits, such as software patent claims, embody patent eligible...
View ArticleLight on analysis, heavy on conclusion, no claim construction, CAFC rules...
How patent claims can be invalidated without a proper and thorough claim construction is baffling. It flies in the face of everything patent law stands for and does nothing but encourage patent...
View ArticleSoftware Patents Will Survive: How Section 101 Law Is Settling Down
I think the reality is that software patents in some form are here to stay for the foreseeable future; it is also true that things that used to be considered patent-eligible no longer are. Assuming...
View Article